🔗 Share this article

Transpired he could survive losing against Grimsby. Survive a decisive European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for using too much that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.